Most teams treat data as an asset.
Few teams treat data relationships as one.
That’s a mistake.
In modern systems, data rarely fails because of missing storage or compute. It fails because no one truly understands how tables relate to each other anymore.
And that becomes a serious engineering problem at scale.
The Real Issue: Schemas Don’t Reflect Reality
In theory:
· Foreign keys define structure
· Naming conventions clarify meaning
· Documentation explains relationships
In practice:
· Foreign keys are missing or unreliable
· Naming conventions drift over time
· Systems evolve independently
· Cross-database dependencies are undocumented
Most large organizations run dozens of systems and thousands of tables. Relationship knowledge becomes:
· Implicit
· Assumed
· Buried in application logic
· Lost when engineers leave
Every integration project ends up rediscovering relationships manually.
That’s not scalable.
Why This Breaks AI, Analytics, and Governance
Without reliable relationship intelligence:
· NL2SQL systems guess JOIN paths
· BI teams duplicate integration logic
· Governance tools show pipeline lineage, not semantic relationships
· Migrations turn into reverse-engineering exercises
The root problem is structural:
Relationships are not stored as explicit, verified, reusable objects.
They live in data behavior — not in documentation.
A Data-First Approach to Relationship Discovery
Instead of relying on schema assumptions, relationships can be inferred empirically by analyzing the data itself.
For example:
· Distinct value counts
· Null distributions
· Domain overlap
· Inclusion ratios
If the values of one column consistently appear within another column’s domain, that is structural evidence — not naming coincidence.
When you shift from schema-based belief to data-verified inclusion, relationship discovery becomes deterministic.
This is the design philosophy behind Arisyn.
What Arisyn Actually Does
Arisyn is an algorithmic data relationship discovery engine.
It connects to enterprise databases and analyzes column-level statistical characteristics such as:
· Distinct value counts
· Null ratios
· Value frequency patterns
· Cross-table inclusion behavior
From this, it detects structural relationships including:
· Inclusion (foreign-key-like containment)
· Equivalence
· Hierarchical patterns
· Cross-system associations
These discovered relationships are stored as a machine-readable graph:
· Tables → nodes
· Verified column links → edges
· Multi-hop paths automatically computed
The system can then generate executable JOIN paths and structured JSON relationship outputs.
No training data.
No manual mapping.
No reliance on naming conventions.
Just data-driven structure.
Engineering Implications
Once relationships are explicit and reusable:
· AI systems operate within validated structural constraints
· Data integration becomes deterministic
· Governance reflects actual dependencies
· Legacy systems can be analyzed without documentation
· New data sources can be evaluated immediately
Relationship intelligence becomes infrastructure.
And infrastructure scales.
Why This Matters Now
We’ve optimized compute.
We’ve optimized storage.
We’ve optimized orchestration.
But we still treat relationship knowledge as tribal engineering memory.
As systems grow and AI usage increases, structural correctness becomes critical.
Data is an asset.
But data relationships are what make it usable.
And they need to be managed explicitly — not rediscovered every quarter.
If you're working on large-scale data integration, AI-enabled analytics, or legacy modernization, relationship discovery is not optional anymore.
It’s foundational.
Learn more: https://www.arisyn.com
Top comments (0)