DEV Community

Cover image for Battery-Included WebRTC: Orchestrating LiveKit with the Python Server SDK
Lalit Mishra
Lalit Mishra

Posted on

Battery-Included WebRTC: Orchestrating LiveKit with the Python Server SDK

The Evolution from "Plumbing" to "Platform"

For the better part of a decade, building scalable real-time video applications meant becoming a plumber. You didn't just build an app; you managed janus-gateway config files, tuned mediasoup workers, wrestled with coturn for NAT traversal, and wrote custom C++ wrappers to handle recording. You were effectively building a telecom carrier from scratch just to add video chat to a website.

LiveKit represents the maturation of this stack. It is an opinionated, "batteries-included" WebRTC infrastructure that abstracts the low-level media transport (SFU) while exposing rigorous control via SDKs.

For the Python backend architect, LiveKit fundamentally shifts the responsibility model. You no longer manage media packets; you manage media sessions. Your Python backend becomes the Orchestrator, using the livekit-api server SDK to provision rooms, mint security tokens, and trigger cloud recordings, all while communicating with the LiveKit server via high-performance Twirp (a structured RPC framework based on Protobuf).

The LiveKit Ecosystem: Architecture of Abstraction

To orchestrate LiveKit, you must understand its topology. It is not a monolithic black box but a distributed system of services.

  1. LiveKit Server (Go): The SFU (Selective Forwarding Unit). It handles the heavy lifting: receiving RTP packets, performing bandwidth estimation, and forwarding streams to subscribers.
  2. Client SDKs: Libraries running on the user's device (React, Swift, Kotlin, Unity). They handle device capture and the WebRTC handshake.
  3. Server SDKs (Python/Go/Node): This is your domain. The Server SDK does not handle media (usually). It handles Signaling and Control. It talks to the LiveKit Server to say, "Create a room," "Mute this user," or "Start recording."

This separation is critical. Your Python Flask/FastAPI application is the Control Plane. The LiveKit Server is the Data Plane.

a system architecture diagram. Visual: Central node

The Orchestrator's Tool: livekit-api

In Python, the interaction happens primarily through the livekit-api package. Unlike the livekit package (which is used for building Real-time Agents that send/receive audio), livekit-api is purely for HTTP/RPC management.

1. The Gatekeeper: JWT Authentication

LiveKit delegates authentication entirely to your backend. The LiveKit server has no user database. Instead, it relies on JSON Web Tokens (JWT) signed with an API Key and Secret that you share between your Python backend and the LiveKit server.

When a user wants to join a room, they request a token from your API. Your Python code defines exactly what that user can do via Video Grants.

import os
from livekit import api

# Ensure LIVEKIT_API_KEY and LIVEKIT_API_SECRET are in env
def create_participant_token(room_name: str, participant_identity: str, is_admin: bool = False):
    grant = api.VideoGrants(
        room_join=True,
        room=room_name,
        can_publish=True,
        can_subscribe=True,
        # Administrative powers
        room_admin=is_admin,  
        room_record=is_admin
    )

    token = api.AccessToken() \
       .with_identity(participant_identity) \
       .with_name(f"User {participant_identity}") \
       .with_grants(grant) \
       .with_ttl(60 * 60) # 1 hour expiration

    return token.to_jwt()

Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Architectural Note: Never generate tokens on the client. Always generate them server-side. This allows you to revoke access, enforce bans, or dynamically assign permissions (e.g., a "stage hand" user who can mute others but not publish video) based on your application's business logic.

a security flow diagram. Visual: Step 1: Client sends

2. Room Lifecycle Management

While rooms can be created automatically when a user joins, production systems often require Explicit Room Provisioning. You might want to create a room 5 minutes before a meeting starts, set specific timeouts, or limit the max participants.

Using the LiveKitAPI client, this becomes a strictly typed async operation.

import asyncio
from livekit import api

async def provision_meeting_room(meeting_id: str):
    # Initialize the API client
    lkapi = api.LiveKitAPI(
        url=os.getenv("LIVEKIT_URL"),
        api_key=os.getenv("LIVEKIT_API_KEY"),
        api_secret=os.getenv("LIVEKIT_API_SECRET"),
    )

    try:
        # Create a room with strict settings
        room_info = await lkapi.room.create_room(
            api.CreateRoomRequest(
                name=meeting_id,
                empty_timeout=300, # Close after 5 mins if empty
                max_participants=50,
                metadata='{"type": "webinar", "host_id": "user_123"}'
            )
        )
        print(f"Room '{room_info.name}' created with SID: {room_info.sid}")
        return room_info
    finally:
        await lkapi.aclose()

Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

This API also allows you to moderate active rooms. You can programmatically mute a disruptive user, update their permissions (e.g., promoting an attendee to a speaker), or remove them entirely.

3. Webhooks: The Feedback Loop

Orchestration is bidirectional. Your Python backend tells LiveKit what to do, but LiveKit must also tell your backend what happened. Did the recording finish? Did the room close? Did a user disconnect unexpectedly?

LiveKit pushes these events via Webhooks. Your backend must verify the cryptographic signature of these webhooks to ensure they are legitimate.

from flask import Flask, request
from livekit import api

app = Flask(__name__)
receiver = api.WebhookReceiver(api.TokenVerifier())

@app.route('/livekit/webhook', methods=)
def handle_webhook():
    auth_header = request.headers.get('Authorization')
    body = request.data.decode('utf-8')

    try:
        event = receiver.receive(body, auth_header)
    except Exception as e:
        return "Invalid signature", 401

    if event.event == "room_finished":
        print(f"Room {event.room.name} ended. Duration: {event.room.duration}s")
        # Trigger billing logic or cleanup

    elif event.event == "participant_joined":
        print(f"User {event.participant.identity} joined.")

    return "ok"

Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

The "Magic" of Abstraction: Simulcast & Dynacast

In raw WebRTC (e.g., using mediasoup), enabling Simulcast (sending multiple qualities of the same video) requires complex client-side configuration and server-side handling. You have to manually negotiate spatial layers.

LiveKit abstracts this entirely.

  1. Simulcast: The Client SDK automatically publishes 3 layers (low, medium, high) if the bandwidth permits.
  2. Dynacast: The LiveKit Server monitors what every subscriber is actually watching. If User A minimizes User B's video to a 100x100 thumbnail, the server automatically switches User A to the low-quality stream of User B. If User A maximizes the video, the server switches them to high-quality.

This optimization saves massive amounts of bandwidth and CPU on the client side, and as a Python architect, you get it for free. You don't write code for it; it is an infrastructure guarantee.

Egress: The Server-Side Recording Pipeline

Recording is the hardest problem in WebRTC. You cannot just "save" packets because they are encrypted (SRTP) and arrive out of order with variable bitrates. Traditionally, you had to spin up a headless Chrome instance with Selenium, join the call, and screen record it. It was brittle and resource-heavy.

LiveKit provides Egress as a first-class service. It runs its own worker pool (often using GStreamer/Chrome under the hood) but exposes a clean API to your Python backend.

You can trigger a Composite Recording (mixing audio/video into a standard layout) or a Track Recording (saving raw ISO feeds) with one call.

a diagram showing the Egress flow. Visual:

async def start_recording(room_name: str):
    lkapi = api.LiveKitAPI(...)

    # Configure output to S3
    s3_output = api.EncodedFileOutput(
        filepath=f"recordings/{room_name}/{'{time}'}.mp4",
        s3=api.S3Upload(
            access_key="...",
            secret="...",
            bucket="my-bucket",
            region="us-east-1"
        )
    )

    request = api.RoomCompositeEgressRequest(
        room_name=room_name,
        layout="grid", # or 'speaker-dark', 'single-speaker'
        file=s3_output,
        # Encode options (H.264 High Profile)
        preset=api.EncodingOptionsPreset.H264_1080P_30
    )

    info = await lkapi.egress.start_room_composite_egress(request)
    print(f"Recording started. Egress ID: {info.egress_id}")

Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

This single function call replaces weeks of engineering work required to build a custom recording pipeline using FFmpeg or GStreamer directly.

Conclusion: Velocity vs. Control

LiveKit does not prevent you from dropping down to the metal if you need to; you can still write raw Go services that interface with the SFU. However, for 95% of use cases—telehealth, virtual classrooms, live events—the abstraction level provided by the Python SDK is the "sweet spot."

By treating WebRTC as a managed service rather than a protocol to be implemented, you shift your engineering effort from infrastructure maintenance (keeping the SFU alive, handling reconnects) to application features (moderation tools, AI integration, recording workflows). In the modern real-time economy, that velocity is your competitive advantage.

Top comments (0)