AI isn't just displacing juniors. It's dissolving the substrate that seniority was built on. The real question is whether seniors can evolve fast enough to meet what's coming.
Why the old mentality feels safer
The traditional ladder—junior → mid → senior—gave everyone a predictable story about how competence forms. It gave seniors a moral high ground ("I paid my dues"), a sense of earned authority, and a clear role in the ecosystem.
If they accept that AI is erasing the task-based apprenticeship layer, they must also accept:
- Their own seniority was built on a substrate that no longer exists.
- Their accumulated knowledge is no longer the bottleneck.
- Their value must shift from "I know how to do this" to "I know how to think about this."
- The industry will not validate them the way it validated previous generations.
That's a terrifying identity transition for people who built their self-worth on technical mastery rather than systems-level reasoning.
So they cling to the narrative that juniors are the ones being harmed. It's easier than confronting the fact that the senior role is mutating into something many of them are unprepared for.
Why this mentality does harm
It traps the whole community in nostalgia instead of adaptation.
- Juniors get told to wait for a ladder that no longer exists.
- Seniors keep optimizing for a role that's disappearing.
- Teams keep pretending mentorship is the bottleneck instead of governance, integration, and continuity.
- Organizations keep hiring for a world that ended in 2023.
Everyone loses because no one is naming the structural shift.
What they need to realize
The senior role is not dying. It's evolving into something more demanding, more interdisciplinary, and more consequential.
The new senior is:
- A systems thinker
- A continuity steward
- A governance architect
- An integrator across tools, humans, and AI agents
- A diagnostician of failure modes, not a ticket closer
This is a different discipline entirely. It requires different training, different instincts, and different forms of apprenticeship.
And until the dev community recognizes that, we'll keep fighting the wrong battle.
If this framing resonates—or provokes—I'm building out a fuller framework on how governance, continuity, and verifiable intent reshape the engineering role. More at Substack.
Top comments (3)
Thanks for writing the article.
I have a different point of view on this, juniors or seniors - they are part of the ecosystem and are not going anywhere, big changes in career progressions happen over time, not immediately like is shown in movies or being spoken under the AI hype right now, for which there is enough criticism already available on public forums. The role demands will keep evolving and we need to keep evolving too - I believe in this.
The senior role is not mutating just yet, at least not in the large enterprises that are build on good amount of IT systems that require trust, reliability and succession planning. I wonder which IT company or enterprise does not need the aforesaid aspects.
I have also tried to document a related aspect in my article here (in case interested) - dev.to/shitij_bhatnagar_b6d1be72/d...
Thanks for reading, Shitij—appreciate you engaging with the work.
This is quite interesting in the age of AI. In this age, AI as set a new bar on the developer's thinking and how we need to match those expectations in order to be success in the career. Great article! Good work :D