DEV Community

Michael Kraft
Michael Kraft

Posted on • Originally published at Medium

Stop Blindly Installing Composer Packages: The R.O.B.U.S.T. Framework

Stop Blindly Installing Composer Packages: The R.O.B.U.S.T. Framework

How a 5-minute check can save your team years of technical debt.

One of the biggest risks in PHP development isn’t the code you write — it’s the code you borrow. Unvetted Composer dependencies lead to security leaks, broken update paths, and “unhappy coding” for the whole team.

After years of troubleshooting, I developed the R.O.B.U.S.T. check. It’s a manual analysis framework to ensure every package you add is an asset, not a liability.

The R.O.B.U.S.T. Framework

R — Research: Know your source

Don’t just composer require. Investigate the maintainer and the community.

  • The Goal: Find the best-documented and most supported package.
  • Check: Is the contributor active? Are issues being discussed and resolved, or is it a “ghost town”?
  • Red Flag: No changelogs, no readme, or a high number of ignored critical bugs.

O — Overload: Avoid dependency bloat

Every package you add brings its own baggage.

  • The Goal: Find the “root” package with the smallest footprint.
  • Check: Look at the composer.json requirements. Does a simple “Slug Generator” really need 20 sub-dependencies?
  • Red Flag: Packages that require unstable, dead, or insecure third-party bundles.

B — Benchmark: Performance & Cognitive Load

Code is read more often than written.

  • The Goal: Find the “cheapest” package in terms of CPU, memory, and learning curve.
  • Check: How long does it take a new developer to understand the API?
  • Red Flag: Over-engineered solutions that consume 300% more resources than a native PHP function.

U — Updates: Stay fresh

A package that doesn’t evolve will eventually break your project.

  • The Goal: Use packages that keep pace with PHP’s release cycle.
  • Check: Does it support the latest PHP version? Does it follow Semantic Versioning (SemVer)?
  • Red Flag: No updates for over a year or packages stuck in “permanent beta” (v0.x.x) for years.

S — Source: Quality & Standards

Your project is only as clean as its messiest dependency.

  • The Goal: Find code that follows industry standards.
  • Check: Does it follow PSR standards and SOLID principles?
  • Red Flag: Packages that force anti-patterns into your architecture or lack proper error handling.

T — Tests: Reliability

If it’s not tested, it’s broken.

  • The Goal: Ensure the package won’t fail you in production.
  • Check: Review the test suite and coverage.
  • Pro Tip: As the experts at thephp.cc say: “If there is no documentation → read the tests!”

Case Study: Applying R.O.B.U.S.T. to Industry Giants

Example 1: Guzzle (The HTTP Client)

Research: Guzzle is the gold standard for HTTP requests. It features world-class documentation, a massive community, and maintainers who resolve critical issues rapidly.

Overload: It is highly modular. Instead of reinventing the wheel, it relies on standardized interfaces (PSR-7, PSR-17, PSR-18). You only load what is necessary for HTTP communication.

Benchmark: Despite its power, it remains highly performant. Its support for asynchronous requests (promises) saves massive amounts of time compared to native curl when handling parallel calls.

Updates: Guzzle is famous for supporting new PHP core versions (like PHP 8.2 or 8.3) often during their beta phases. It strictly adheres to Semantic Versioning (SemVer).

Source: The codebase is a prime example of Clean Code and PHP-FIG standards. It encourages developers to use good patterns, such as middleware support.

Tests: The test coverage is nearly 100%. With built-in mock handlers, it even helps developers test their own integrations safely.

Example 2: Carbon (The DateTime Library)

Research: As the default extension for DateTime in PHP (and a core part of Laravel), its reputation is flawless. The documentation is a “one-stop-shop” that answers every possible question.

Overload: Carbon has one specific job: time manipulation. It doesn’t carry unnecessary third-party bloat that is unrelated to date and time.

Benchmark: Since it extends PHP’s native DateTime class, the overhead is minimal. The learning curve is almost zero because it simply makes existing methods more intuitive.

Updates: With almost weekly releases for bugfixes and improvements, it is incredibly “fresh.” Backward compatibility is treated as a top priority.

Source: Carbon follows SOLID principles and solves one of PHP’s biggest headaches by offering CarbonImmutable.

Tests: A standout feature is its testing utility, like setTestNow(), which allows developers to “freeze” time. The package itself is tested against hundreds of edge cases, including leap years and timezone shifts.

Final Thoughts: From “Happy Coding” to “Production Ready”

The next time you are about to run composer require, stop for a second. Don't let a “quick fix” become a long-term technical debt.

By applying the R.O.B.U.S.T. check, you are not just choosing code; you are choosing the stability of your project and the peace of mind of your team.

Remember: High-quality software isn’t just about the code you write, but also about the code you trust.

You can find my initial bulletpointlist on github https://github.com/kraftartberlin-micha/robust-check

Top comments (0)