DEV Community

Mark
Mark

Posted on

I've Been Coding for 25 Years - Repository Pattern Tutorials Are Lying to You #juniordeveloper #code

You know that feeling when you watch a tutorial, everything makes perfect sense, you implement it in your project... and suddenly you're wondering if you've just made your life way more complicated for no reason?

Yeah, let's talk about the Repository Pattern - and specifically, all the stuff that tutorials conveniently leave out.

The Relatable Pain Point 😫

Here's what most junior developers do - and honestly, I did this too when I started.

You learn about the Repository Pattern, and you're like "Alright, abstraction! Separation of concerns! This is gonna be amazing!"

So you create a repository for EVERYTHING.

UserRepository, ProductRepository, OrderRepository, ShippingAddressRepository, UserPreferenceRepository...

You end up with like 47 repository interfaces, each with methods like GetById, GetAll, Add, Update, Delete...

And here's the kicker - 90% of them are literally just passing data straight through to Entity Framework or whatever ORM you're using. Zero business logic. Zero actual value.

You've basically recreated your ORM's API... but worse.

And now you've got twice as many files to maintain, and every time you need to add a field to your database, you're updating like four different places.

Sound familiar? Yeah, we've all been there.

What Battle-Tested Seniors Actually Do 🧘

So here's what a calm, experienced developer would tell you over coffee:

"The Repository Pattern isn't about wrapping EVERYTHING. It's about isolating complex data access logic."

Let me break this down:

If your data access is literally just "get this from the database" - you probably don't need a repository. Just use your ORM directly. It's fine. Really.

But here's when you DO want a repository:

  1. Complex Queries - When you're doing gnarly joins, aggregations, or business-specific data filtering
  2. Multiple Data Sources - When you're combining data from your database, a cache, and an external API
  3. Testing Complex Logic - When you actually need to mock out complicated data access for unit tests
  4. Changing Data Sources - When you genuinely might swap out your data store (though be honest, how often does that REALLY happen?)

The senior developer doesn't create repositories by default. They create them when they solve a specific problem.

It's not about following a pattern religiously - it's about solving actual problems in your codebase.

Real-World Example: The Good and The Bad 📊

Let me show you the difference.

❌ BAD - The Over-Engineered Approach

You've got a simple User entity. All you do is basic CRUD. But you still create:

  • IUserRepository interface
  • UserRepository implementation
  • Both injected via DI
  • Probably some DTOs for good measure

And literally ALL your repository does is:

public async Task<User> GetById(int id) 
{
    return await _dbContext.Users.FindAsync(id);
}

public async Task<List<User>> GetAll() 
{
    return await _dbContext.Users.ToListAsync();
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Congratulations, you just added 200 lines of code to do what Entity Framework already does in one line.

✅ GOOD - The Thoughtful Approach

Now imagine you're building an analytics dashboard. You need to:

  • Pull order data from your database
  • Aggregate it with user behavior from Redis
  • Combine it with revenue data from Stripe's API
  • Apply complex business rules about what counts as a "conversion"

THAT'S when you create an AnalyticsRepository.

Why? Because:

  1. That logic is complex and needs to live somewhere
  2. You want to test that logic without hitting three different data sources
  3. The rest of your code doesn't care WHERE this data comes from - it just needs the analytics 
public class AnalyticsRepository : IAnalyticsRepository
{
    private readonly AppDbContext _db;
    private readonly IRedisCache _cache;
    private readonly IStripeClient _stripe;

    public async Task<ConversionMetrics> GetConversionMetrics(DateTime start, DateTime end)
    {
        // Complex logic combining multiple sources
        var orders = await _db.Orders
            .Where(o => o.CreatedAt >= start && o.CreatedAt <= end)
            .ToListAsync();

        var userBehavior = await _cache.GetUserBehaviorAsync(start, end);
        var revenueData = await _stripe.GetRevenueDataAsync(start, end);

        // Business logic to determine conversions
        return CalculateConversions(orders, userBehavior, revenueData);
    }
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

See the difference? One solves a problem. One creates a problem.

The Simple Mental Model 🧠

Here's how to think about this - I call it the "Complexity Threshold Test":

Ask yourself: "Is my data access logic more complex than a single line of ORM code?"

  • NO → Just use your ORM directly
  • YES → Consider a repository

Think of repositories like middleware. You don't create middleware just because you can - you create it when you need to do something between the request and the handler.

Same with repositories - you create them when you need to do something between your business logic and your data store.

Another way to think about it:

Repositories are for data access LOGIC, not data access SYNTAX.

If you're just changing syntax (dbContext.Users.Find vs userRepo.GetById), you're doing it wrong.

If you're encapsulating complex logic, you're doing it right.

What You Can Do Tomorrow ⚡

Alright, here's your action item for tomorrow:

Go through your current project and identify your repositories.

For each one, ask:

  1. Does this repository contain any actual logic, or is it just passing through to the ORM?
  2. Would my code be simpler if I just used the ORM directly here?
  3. Am I actually testing this repository, or just mocking it without any real test value?

If you answer "just passing through", "yes it would be simpler", and "just mocking it" - delete that repository.

I know it feels wrong. You've been taught that repositories are "best practice."

But here's the truth: the best code is code you don't have to write.

Start with simple, direct data access. Add repositories only when you feel the pain of NOT having them.

Your future self - the one who has to maintain this code - will thank you.

Key Takeaways 🎯

  • Repositories aren't a checkbox on your "good code" list
  • They're a tool for managing complexity
  • Use them when they solve a problem, not just because a pattern tells you to
  • Don't cargo cult patterns - understand the "why" behind them
  • Simpler is usually better

What's your biggest repository pattern horror story? Have you ever deleted a bunch of unnecessary abstractions and felt that sweet relief? Drop a comment below - I'd love to hear your experiences!

And if you found this helpful, consider giving it a ❤️ and following for more "what they don't tell you" content about software development.

Happy coding! 🚀

Note: This article was written with AI assistance to help structure and articulate 25+ years of debugging experience. All examples, insights, and methodologies are from real-world experience.

Top comments (0)