DEV Community

Cover image for Git Blamed Me, CSS Gaslit Me, Node Ghosted Me, React Re-rendered My Trauma
Art light
Art light

Posted on

Git Blamed Me, CSS Gaslit Me, Node Ghosted Me, React Re-rendered My Trauma

I have been writing code long enough to remember when “version control” meant emailing final_final_v3_REAL.zip.

Over the years I’ve learned something important:

The compiler may be strict.
The runtime may be brutal.
But the frontend stack?

The frontend stack is emotionally manipulative.

Let’s talk about it.

Git: The Historian Who Remembers Everything You Regret

Git doesn’t judge you.

It simply remembers.

You can lie to your coworkers.
You can lie to your future self.
You cannot lie to Git.

git blame
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

There it is.
Your name.
Next to the line.

From 2019.

When you thought // temporary fix meant temporary.

Git is deterministic. It’s cryptographic memory. A content-addressable filesystem wrapped in Merkle trees. Every commit is a SHA-1/SHA-256 fingerprint of your past decisions.

Git doesn’t forget.
It just rebases your shame.

And yet, it’s honest. When something breaks, Git says:

“You did this.”

No ambiguity. No vibes. Just hashes.

CSS: The Gaslighting Language

CSS is not deterministic.

CSS is interpretive dance.

You say:

width: 300px;
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

The browser says:

“That’s adorable.”

Because somewhere:

  • box-sizing exists
  • flex exists
  • min-width exists
  • !important exists
  • Specificity exists
  • The cascade exists
  • And someone imported a global reset from 2014

CSS doesn’t throw errors.
It silently negotiates.

You can write completely valid CSS that does absolutely nothing.

That’s not programming.
That’s passive aggression.

The cascade is essentially:

“Multiple people have opinions. The loudest one wins.”

Specificity is a weighted scoring algorithm pretending to be styling.

And don’t get me started on:

position: absolute;

That’s not layout.
That’s teleportation.

Node.js: The Event Loop That Never Sleeps (But Sometimes Forgets)

Node is single-threaded.

Which sounds simple.

Until you remember that it isn’t.

It’s single-threaded with:

  • An event loop
  • A microtask queue
  • A macrotask queue
  • Worker threads
  • libuv
  • Non-blocking I/O
  • And the emotional baggage of callbacks from 2012

You don’t “run” Node code.

You schedule intentions.

setTimeout(() => console.log("A"), 0);
Promise.resolve().then(() => console.log("B"));
console.log("C");
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Output?

C
B
A

Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Node doesn’t execute in order.

It executes in phases.

Timers → Pending callbacks → Idle → Poll → Check → Close callbacks.

And inside those phases?
Microtasks jump the line like caffeinated squirrels.

You thought you understood time.

Node said: “Time is a queue.”

React: The Illusion of Control

React is not a framework.

React is a philosophical position.

You do not update the DOM.

You describe a UI state.

React decides what actually happens.

You say:

setCount(count + 1);
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

React says:

“Eventually.”

Because state is asynchronous.
Because batching exists.
Because reconciliation exists.
Because the Virtual DOM is diffing trees like a botanist with OCD.

You render.

React re-renders.

You memoize.

React still re-renders.

You add useMemo, useCallback, React.memo, dependency arrays, and one missing dependency later your component is either:

  • Re-rendering infinitely
  • Or frozen in time

React doesn’t break.

It just re-evaluates your life choices.

Determinism vs Vibes

Git is deterministic.
CSS is interpretive.
Node is temporal.
React is declarative gaslighting.

Git says:

“This changed.”

CSS says:

“Maybe.”

Node says:

“Not yet.”

React says:

“It depends.”

The Full Stack Emotional Lifecycle

  1. You build a feature.
  2. CSS ignores you.
  3. React re-renders 14 times.
  4. Node processes things in an order you didn’t expect.
  5. Git permanently records the experience.

And somehow, it works.

Modern web development is not about writing instructions.

It’s about aligning four different models of reality:

  • Immutable history (Git)
  • Cascading negotiation (CSS)
  • Event-driven concurrency (Node)
  • Declarative reactivity (React)

Each one is internally consistent.

Together?

They are chaos in business casual.

But Here’s the Truth

Despite the sarcasm, this stack is powerful because of its philosophy:

  • Git gives us cryptographic trust.
  • CSS gives us composable design systems.
  • Node gives us scalable I/O concurrency.
  • React gives us predictable UI state modeling.

Each solves a real computer science problem:

  • Distributed version control
  • Declarative styling resolution
  • Event-loop concurrency
  • Virtual DOM diffing and reconciliation

They are not random tools.

They are abstractions over deep complexity.

And when they align?

You ship.

Final Thought

The web stack isn’t broken.

It’s layered.

Git remembers who you were.
CSS negotiates what you meant.
Node schedules when it happens.
React decides what it looks like.

And somehow — despite all of this — the button still clicks.

That’s modern engineering.

And honestly?

I wouldn’t trade it.

Top comments (12)

Collapse
 
aezur profile image
Peter Mulligan

You can write completely valid CSS that does absolutely nothing.

I thought my repository was private.

Collapse
 
art_light profile image
Art light

Thanks for your reply.

Collapse
 
aezur profile image
Peter Mulligan

Gotta feed the algo Gods. :)

Thread Thread
 
art_light profile image
Art light

👌

Collapse
 
dorothyjb profile image
Dorothy J Aubrey

I laughed way harder at this than I should have… until “CSS is interpretive dance.,” at which point it stopped being comedy and started being a documentary. 😄😄😄

Collapse
 
art_light profile image
Art light

Haha, that line is painfully accurate — CSS really does feel like interpretive dance sometimes 😄 You captured that developer truth perfectly, and that’s what makes it so brilliant.

Collapse
 
mirko_stahnke_a9da18e5549 profile image
Mirko Stahnke

CSS ist wie Mathematik lach

Thread Thread
 
art_light profile image
Art light

Good😎

Collapse
 
theminimalcreator profile image
Guilherme Zaia

Your post brilliantly captures the emotional rollercoaster of frontend development! 💡 It's fascinating how we must navigate the deterministic world of Git against the unpredictability of CSS. Balancing these paradigms really tests our resilience. Thanks for highlighting the essence of this complex stack!

Collapse
 
art_light profile image
Art light

This is such a sharp observation — you perfectly captured the tension between Git’s strict, deterministic history model and CSS’s often unpredictable rendering behavior. That contrast really exposes a core frontend challenge: we can version-control state precisely, but layout bugs still emerge from cascading rules, browser quirks, and implicit dependencies.

In my opinion, strengthening architectural boundaries — like stricter component isolation, predictable styling strategies, or better diff-based visual testing — can reduce that chaos significantly. I’m genuinely interested in exploring patterns that make CSS behavior more deterministic at scale, especially in large teams where Git discipline is strong but UI drift still happens. Great perspective — this is the kind of technical reflection frontend engineers need more often.

Collapse
 
benjamin_nguyen_8ca6ff360 profile image
Benjamin Nguyen

Great explanation!

Collapse
 
art_light profile image
Art light

Thanks👍