DEV Community

Cover image for What Happens When Your API Provider Shuts Down
APIVerve
APIVerve

Posted on • Originally published at blog.apiverve.com

What Happens When Your API Provider Shuts Down

The email arrives on a Tuesday afternoon.

"Dear valued customer, after careful consideration, we have made the difficult decision to discontinue our API service effective [date 60 days from now]."

Your stomach drops. That API is in production. Real users depend on it. And now you have 60 days — if you're lucky — to find an alternative, rewrite the integration, test everything, and deploy without breaking the features your customers expect.

This happens more often than you'd think. And it will probably happen to you at least once in your career.

Here's what actually happens when an API provider shuts down, and how to survive it.

The Shutdown Timeline

Not all shutdowns are equal. The timeline tells you a lot about what you're dealing with.

The Good Shutdown (3-6 months notice):

A professional company is winding down responsibly. You'll get email notifications, documentation updates, and usually a recommended alternative. This is manageable. Stressful, but manageable.

The Bad Shutdown (30-60 days notice):

Something went wrong — funding dried up, acquisition fell through, or they just want out fast. This is crisis mode. Everything else gets deprioritized while you scramble.

The Ugly Shutdown (0 days notice):

The API just stops responding. Maybe the company went bankrupt overnight. Maybe the solo developer abandoned the project. Maybe the servers got turned off for non-payment.

You find out because production alerts fire or users start complaining. This is damage control.

Stage 1: Denial and Debugging

When an API starts failing unexpectedly, your first instinct is to blame your code.

"We probably deployed something that broke the integration."

You check git logs. Nothing relevant. You check your error handling. It looks fine. You try the request manually with curl. Same error.

Then you check the provider's status page — if they have one. You check their Twitter. You search for news.

That's when the realization hits: it's not you. It's them. And there's nothing you can do to fix their servers.

This stage lasts anywhere from 10 minutes to several hours, depending on how good your monitoring is.

Stage 2: Assessment

Once you've confirmed the provider is the problem, you need to assess the damage.

What features depend on this API?

Map out every place in your codebase that calls this service. It's usually more than you think. That "simple" email validation API might be called from your signup form, your contact form, your newsletter subscription, and three internal tools.

How critical are those features?

Can your product function without this API? Is it a nice-to-have or a core feature? If users can't complete purchases because address validation is down, that's a different priority than if user avatars aren't loading.

What's your error handling doing?

When the API fails, what do users experience? A graceful degradation? A cryptic error message? A white screen of death? The quality of your error handling determines how much fire you're fighting right now.

Stage 3: Short-Term Survival

If the shutdown was unexpected, you need to stop the bleeding.

Option A: Feature flag it off.

If the API-dependent feature isn't critical, disable it temporarily. A "coming soon" message is better than an error message. Buy yourself time.

Option B: Mock it.

Can you return hardcoded or cached data while you find a replacement? If it's a currency conversion API, maybe yesterday's exchange rates are acceptable for a day or two.

Option C: Manual process.

For critical, low-volume features, can a human do what the API did? Nobody wants to manually validate email addresses, but if it keeps the business running while you find a replacement, it's worth considering.

The goal of Stage 3 is to get your product into a stable state where users can still use it, even if some features are degraded.

Stage 4: Finding a Replacement

Now the real work begins.

What you're looking for:

A replacement that does the same thing, accepts similar inputs, and returns similar outputs. The closer the match, the easier the migration.

What you're actually finding:

APIs that mostly do the same thing, with slightly different inputs, slightly different outputs, slightly different authentication, and completely different error codes.

Welcome to the migration project.

Evaluation questions:

  • Does it cover all the functionality you were using?
  • What's the pricing at your volume?
  • How's the documentation?
  • How stable does the provider seem?
  • How hard will the integration be?

You're balancing speed against thoroughness. You need a solution now, but you also don't want to be in this exact situation again in six months.

Stage 5: The Migration

With a replacement selected, you start the rewrite.

The wrapper pattern:

Don't scatter API-specific code throughout your codebase. Create a wrapper or service layer that abstracts the API. Your application code calls validateEmail(email), and the wrapper handles the specifics of whatever provider you're using.

If you'd done this originally, this migration would be much easier. If you didn't, do it now. You'll thank yourself later.

Testing the edge cases:

The new API won't behave exactly like the old one. Same inputs might give slightly different outputs. Run your test suite. Run it again with production-like data. Find the differences before your users do.

Staged rollout:

Don't flip a switch and migrate all traffic at once. Start with a small percentage. Monitor for errors. Increase gradually. This catches problems when they're small, not when they're affecting everyone.

Stage 6: Post-Mortem

After the crisis passes, learn from it.

Why didn't you see this coming?

Were there warning signs? Declining documentation updates? Support requests going unanswered? A company that seemed unstable? What would have told you this was coming?

How can you be more resilient?

Should you have a backup provider for critical APIs? Should your architecture make switching easier? Should you evaluate provider stability more carefully upfront?

What can you automate?

Can you set up monitoring that alerts you to API degradation before users notice? Can you document your API dependencies somewhere so the next migration is faster?

The Providers Most Likely to Disappear

Some patterns predict shutdowns:

Venture-funded startups burning cash: If the API is free and the company has raised money, they're betting on future monetization. If that bet doesn't pay off, they'll shut down or pivot.

Solo developer projects: Maintained by one person. What happens when they get a new job, burn out, or just lose interest?

Free tiers of larger services: These get cut when companies restructure. "We're focusing on our enterprise offering" is code for "free tier users are about to have a bad day."

Acquisitions: "We're excited to join [larger company]" often means "and we'll be shutting down our standalone service in 18 months."

Lack of business model: How do they make money? If you can't figure it out, they might not have figured it out either.

Building Resilience Before You Need It

The best time to prepare for an API shutdown is before it happens.

Abstract your dependencies.

Never sprinkle API calls directly throughout your codebase. One service layer, one place to change when the provider changes.

Keep alternatives in mind.

For every critical API, know what the fallback options are. You don't need to implement them, just know they exist.

Monitor health, not just uptime.

Is the API getting slower? Are error rates creeping up? Degradation often precedes shutdown.

Evaluate provider stability.

Before integrating, ask: who runs this? How do they make money? Have they been around for a while? Do they seem financially stable?

Don't over-depend on any single provider.

For critical functions, consider whether you can distribute across providers or have a hot standby ready.

The Emotional Part

API shutdowns are stressful. Unexpectedly stressful.

You chose this provider. You vouched for it in architecture discussions. You built features on it. And now it's failing, and you feel responsible.

That's normal. But remember: providers fail. It's a when, not an if. Your job isn't to prevent all failures. It's to recover from them quickly when they happen.

The developers who thrive aren't the ones who never face API shutdowns. They're the ones who have plans for when it happens.

Checklist: Preparing for the Inevitable

Run through this for every critical API dependency:

  • [ ] Code is abstracted behind a service layer
  • [ ] At least one alternative provider identified
  • [ ] Monitoring in place for API health
  • [ ] Error handling gracefully degrades
  • [ ] Team knows who owns this integration
  • [ ] Provider stability has been evaluated

If you can check all these boxes, you'll still have work to do when a shutdown happens. But it'll be manageable work, not crisis work.

API provider shutdowns are part of building software. The question isn't whether it'll happen to you, but whether you'll be ready when it does.

Choose providers carefully. Abstract your dependencies. Have a plan.

And when the "Service Discontinuation Notice" arrives, you'll know exactly what to do.

Looking for APIs built on stable infrastructure? Browse the APIVerve catalog — enterprise reliability, transparent roadmap, and a team committed to keeping things running.


Originally published at APIVerve Blog

Top comments (0)