*This is a submission for the [Hermes Agent Challenge]
When I first heard about agentic AI systems, I imagined something much more capable than a traditional chatbot.
A chatbot answers questions.
An AI agent plans, reasons, uses tools, and works toward a goal.
That idea led me to explore Hermes Agent and build my first autonomous AI project: Hermes Commander.
Why I Chose Hermes Agent
As someone interested in AI, prompt engineering, and autonomous systems, I wanted to understand how modern AI agents actually work.
Most tutorials focus on prompts and conversations. Hermes Agent felt different because it provides a framework for building systems that can use tools, navigate workflows, and perform multi-step tasks.
I wanted to move beyond simple chat interactions and experiment with agentic behavior.
Setting Up Hermes Agent
My journey was not completely smooth.
I installed Hermes Agent locally, configured providers, experimented with Gemini models, and connected browser capabilities.
Along the way I encountered:
- Provider configuration issues
- Authentication challenges
- API quota limitations
- Model selection decisions
While these issues were sometimes frustrating, they helped me understand how real-world AI systems operate beyond simple demos.
One of the biggest lessons was that building AI agents involves infrastructure, tooling, and workflow design—not just prompts.
What Makes Hermes Agent Interesting?
The most interesting aspect of Hermes Agent is its focus on actions instead of only responses.
For example, the agent can:
- Create plans
- Manage tasks
- Access tools
- Navigate browser environments
- Execute multi-step workflows
This shifts the experience from:
"Ask a question, get an answer"
to
"Give a goal, let the agent determine how to approach it."
That difference is what makes agentic systems exciting.
Building Hermes Commander
To explore these capabilities, I created Hermes Commander.
Hermes Commander is an autonomous research assistant designed to:
- Understand research goals
- Generate structured plans
- Organize tasks
- Use available tools
- Assist with technical investigations
One of my favorite moments was seeing the agent generate a complete research workflow for investigating AI agent frameworks.
Instead of immediately answering, it first created a plan, organized tasks, and structured the work.
That felt much closer to working with an assistant than a traditional chatbot.
Lessons Learned
Building my first AI agent taught me several important lessons:
1. Tool Use Matters
An AI agent becomes far more useful when it can interact with tools and external systems.
2. Planning Is Powerful
The ability to break a large goal into smaller tasks is one of the most valuable agent capabilities.
3. Infrastructure Matters
Provider setup, quotas, APIs, and environment configuration are all critical parts of the development process.
4. Agentic AI Is Still Evolving
We are only beginning to see what autonomous AI systems can accomplish.
Looking Ahead
My next goal is to continue improving Hermes Commander and explore local model support through Ollama.
I am particularly interested in building agents that can:
- Perform deeper research
- Generate reports
- Maintain memory
- Coordinate multiple workflows
Hermes Agent provided an excellent introduction to this space and helped me take my first practical step into agentic AI development.
Final Thoughts
Building Hermes Commander was more than a technical project.
It was an opportunity to understand how AI agents think, plan, and interact with the world through tools.
The experience reinforced my belief that the future of AI is not only about better conversations.
It is about systems that can take action.
And for me, Hermes Agent was the starting point of that journey.
Top comments (2)
Nice, building your first agent is the fastest way to actually understand them. You learn quickly that the model is the easy part and the loop around it (deciding when to call a tool, what to do with the result, when to stop) is the real work. The thing that'll level you up quickest: add a verify step early, don't trust the agent's output just because it sounds confident, check that it actually did the thing. That habit separates agents that work from agents that just look like they work. It's the core of how I built Moonshift's pipeline. What's yours doing, and have you hit the "loops forever or stops too early" problem yet?
Thanks! That's a great point about adding a verification step early. I'm building my first agent with Hermes Agent, so right now I'm focusing on understanding the full cycle of planning, tool usage, and execution rather than just getting an LLM response.
At the moment, I'm still experimenting with the workflow and learning where validation should happen. I haven't hit an infinite loop yet, but I have seen cases where the agent stops before fully completing the task. That's something I'm actively trying to understand and improve.
Out of curiosity, how do you usually implement verification in Moonshift's pipeline—rule-based checks, another model pass, or a combination of both?